Voices
from the Occupation
Occupy
Justice – One Day, Two Courts
This week in London,
the City of London Corporation is attempting to gain an eviction order for the
St Paul’s camp. Justice Lindblom has
presided over 5 days of evidence from both sides. Meanwhile, Occupy London have occupied their
own court house in Old Street, and enlisted the support of legal professionals,
to begin to put those responsible for the financial crisis on trial. Today’s article brings you reports from both
courts, and the inspirational tale of how to Occupy Justice.
Old
Street Magistrates Court – Occupied
As reported here on 20th December, members of Occupy London and Occupy Veterans arrived at the Old
Street Magistrates court at 4.30am, in a tank festooned with flowers, and
sporting a banner calling it ‘The Tank of Ideas’. The Grade II listed building at the east end
of Old Street (north side) has been empty since 1996, but was sold onto an
Indian property venture in 2006.
Throughout this time, it has been left empty and plans for a community justice
project on the site have been dropped.
Latest plans are for the building to be converted into a hotel. However, Occupy London have other ideas. The group Occupy Justice, the title of the
occupiers at Old Street, have already gained the support of a retired Judge and
Prosecutor, together with a working prosecutor who are providing them with
information about how to structure the trial.
It is also reported that they have confirmed they will attend to ‘try’ the
case. Their intention is to call
witnesses, and invite members of the 1% accused to attend the court to defend
and account for themselves.
(Picture by @HeardinLondon)
The court house is
vast. It runs over several floors,
includes several court rooms, and an old police station, including cells. The old cells have chalk boards by each cell
door where the name of the detained would have been inscribed in the past. These now bear the names – Goldman Sachs,
Tony Blair, etc. A peace flag now hangs proudly from the flagpole on the roof of the building.
I took a short tour of
the building on film below.
To some, this may
appear a mere media stunt, designed to get Occupy London in the headlines.
Firstly, I would
challenge the implicit suggestion in the statement, namely that a PR stunt is
somehow a bad thing. Why would that be a bad thing? The media is occupied most of the time with adverts
of one kind or another; drink THIS beer, eat THIS chocolate, play THIS game,
use THIS shampoo and THAT mascara and for pity’s sake wear THIS perfume! Surely it is simply common sense to attempt
to disrupt this endless stream of consumer messaging with something different –
something inspiring, something thought provoking?
Secondly, there is a
remarkable point to be highlighted by the occupation of the Old Street Magistrates
Court. A group of human beings crashed
the global economy in the pursuit of their own personal mega-wealth. The FSA report, the Public Accounts Committee
report and the Vickers Report all point to fraud, corruption and vigilante
capitalism of the highest degree. To
date, there have been no arrests, no charges and no single conviction of anyone
responsible for the financial crisis.
Not even one. In 3 years. In stark contrast, in the three months since
the Occupy Movement began, this group have seen 5000 arrests in the US alone,
hundreds in the UK. Police have used
pepper spray, rubber bullets, flash bang grenades, sound cannons. Libraries have been burned or thrown into dumper
trucks. People have been pulled, half
asleep from their tents in the middle of the night. People have been kettled, punched, kicked and
pushed. People have been charged, gone
to court and faced fines and imprisonment for daring to protest this injustice.
The growing realisation
for human beings, the realisation which has them pitching tents, moving their
money to credit unions, attending general assemblies, supporting every way they
can – is this; the economy doesn’t work for us, the government doesn’t work for
us, the media doesn’t work for us, the police force doesn’t work for us, the
justice system does not work for us. If the
institutions of our world, at a local and global level, do not work for 99% of
the population, then they do not work.
They are bogus, bankrupt and benefit a tiny proportion of people, over
the exclusion and disenfranchisement of the many, and the plunder of the
planet.
By occupying this
court, Occupy London are, consistent with the movement itself, ceasing to make
demands and adopt conventional protest tactics.
If no one in authority will hold this trial, we will hold it ourselves –
say Occupy London. Below, Leon of Occupy Justice talks about why he occupies, the plans for the court, and reads the initial statement of Occupy Justice.
Royal
Courts of Justice – Occupy Fighting for Justice
Picture from Pressenza.com
Meanwhile, studiously
under reported by the corporate media – the future of the St Pauls occupation
is being defended in Court 25 of the Royal Courts of Justice. Throughout
this week, witness testimony has been made for and against the occupiers
remaining in situ. I attended the
afternoon session on Thursday 22nd December, having been following
live coverage from the court via @alburyj on twitter.
In recent weeks, the
City of London Corporation - the secretive, undemocratic body which runs the
City of London borough - set in chain high court proceedings to evict Occupy
London from the St Pauls site. This
week, the case has been heard before Justice Lindblom at the Royal Courts of
Justice. With support from John Cooper
QC, members of Occupy London are defending themselves as litigants in person –
George Barda, Daniel Ashman and Tammy Samede are in court as OccupyLSX.
The courage of these three cannot be understated. Daniel Ashman discusses the potential
repercussions of his role as litigant in person, in the film interview below.
The City of London’s
case has been based on health & safety grounds and obstructing the
highway. However, in order to gain an
injunction to evict, as reported by the Guardian this week, it is not enough
that the obstruction is wilful, and without lawful excuse – but unreasonable. This means that the Occupy London defence has
centred on the level of communication (often one way on the part of Occupy
London) to both the City of London and St Pauls in an effort to remediate any
health & safety or fire safety concerns.
The second and more vigorous line of defence has been that the site at
St Pauls is perfectly reasonable, given the state of nation and world, and the
need for people to have a place to meet and discuss alternatives. This has given the Occupy movement a voice
within the Justice system, on formal record, of what this movement is about. Win or lose, defence witness after defence
witness has taken to that stand to raise the issues which the camp exists to highlight. In this sense, Occupy London has already won. Even if the eviction order is approved, it only stands for tents and structures - not people. It also only covers the City of London land, not St Pauls.
Picture from GoogleImages
I was brought to tears
twice that afternoon, by two witnesses.
The first, an ordained minister who had come to take a look at Occupy
London and still hadn’t left. He is
perhaps in his late fifties, with short white hair and blue eyes. He wears a black jacket and is slightly
stooped in the stand. He brings to the
attention of the court, the fact that the grounds of St Pauls had been the site
of the Moots in 1213-15. People from all
counties met and camped to produce the Magna Carta, in protest at the
greed of the King and his refusal to honour their rights and freedoms. This is that moment for our time, he
argues. Questioned as to why people had
to camp and not simply just rally at the site without the tents and structures –
the Minister points out that this would make it impossible for many people to
participate. It would make it impossible
for him to participate as he is from the Isle of Wight and could not afford to
keep making trips into London. He also
makes the point that one of the most important purposes of the camp is to
create a community. The camp is now his home, so a decision to evict would make him homeless and that community would
be destroyed by the eviction order.
Finally, asked why he
was a part of the Occupy Movement, the Ministers voice cracks and tears come to
his eyes. He answers that he has a
wonderful eleven year old son, and he has to help to make this world a place
worthy of him. He has never found a
place where he felt that he was really contributing to making the world a
better place, and now he has. That every
fibre of his being tells him he has to be a part of this. He must be here. Across the public gallery, a ripple of consensus
jazz hands wave in the air.
Next to the stand is
Matthew Horne (pictured, above left), a young Iraq veteran who works in the Tech team at Occupy
London, maintaining the IT systems and networks which keep the movement
going. Matthew is small, wiry, dressed
in military camouflage jacket and trousers.
He has black hair and eyes, with olive skin – he is softly spoken with a
northern accent. He tells us that while
he was in Iraq, he was asked to do terrible things. He saw private security operatives vastly
outnumbering British forces, causing chaos in
the cities, while the British forces took the brunt of the response.
He tells of his anger at coming home, to find
out that a station his unit had been defending in Iraq, (he calls it
basically a suicide mission), which they had been told was a vital logistics
station – was in fact an oil field, protected for Halliburton.
He says to us ‘We were told we were fighting
for freedom and democracy – but where’s the freedom and democracy in bashing down
the door of a family in the middle of the night and dragging a husband out of
his wife’s bed based on just some suspicion?
We didn’t let them assemble freely, we didn’t let them vent their anger
in protest, we shot people and beat people and tortured people’.
He tells us that families in Iraq and
families in Britain are suffering under the same system, just in different
ways. The Iraqi families have their
liberty, home and lives taken by bombs.
But British families have their liberty, homes and lives taken away by
the financial crisis, which is a robbery and not a recession. He uses the example of the couple whorecently committed suicide after years of struggling to live on their meagre
benefits – 'people are dying here because of the system we’re in', he says.
Asked why he is camping
at St Pauls, Matthew tells the court that Occupy is now his home. He comes from a backwater part of world where there are so few jobs that DFS opened a new store, offering 19 jobs - and 2000 people applied. 'In that environment', he says, 'how can I live? I cant afford to learn to drive, I couldn't afford the fuel, I can't afford the train fares, I can't afford to go back to education'. He tells of being rejected from a BT role as a telcomms engineer, without an interview, becuase he didn't have GCSE Maths, despite running mililtary telecoms in Iraq for four years. He says that conventional protest has been proved
a catastrophic failure. 36 million
people worldwide marched against the Iraq war, over 1 million in the UK alone
and their voices were simply ignored.
Protest is so contained and restricted that it has no impact. He says ‘The
government doesn’t represent me, but Occupy represents me. Occupy is me’. We are here to represent all the people who are suffering in the world because of this system and arent able to pitch a tent.
The court is adjourned
over night, with final submissions and statements to be made the following
day. Judge Lindblom confirms that he
will not be in a position to make a decision this week, so the news is – Occupy
London will be camping at St Pauls over Christmas! A decision will not be made before 11th
January 2012.
Occupy
Christmas
As I write this, final
submissions and statements are being made to Judge Lindblom. All four Occupy London sites are now
confirmed safe from eviction for the rest of the year. The Bank of Ideas goes back to court on 11th
January, Occupy Justice on the 3rd, St Pauls no sooner than the 11th
and Finsbury Square has no eviction proceedings against it. As camps across the world have been ripped
apart, the UK camps are still going strong.
But this hasn’t stopped the camps innovating by finding alternative
spaces to Occupy; empty offices, courts, social clubs and community centres
have all been occupied across the UK, but the camps remain as the bridge
between them, the villages of hope in our bustling cities. I hope that the Justice system can be used to
protect these sites; I hope we can start taking back our justice system with
judges making a stand for the right of people to peacefully assemble to shape
their world. I hope. Whatever happens – this is merely the
beginning. As the saying goes – you cannot
evict an idea whose time has come. Occupy is an idea whose time has come.
Occupy London have a
packed calendar for Christmas – for full details please go to the website. Scriptonite will be having a family Christmas
and bring Voices from the Occupation back in a few days. Wishing you all a wonderful Christmas period
with your friends, family and community.
Thank you for reading and commenting through 2011. Here’s to making 2012, the year we changed
the world.































